Archive by Month: January 2015

Now, a Subcontractor’s Indemnification Payment can be Used to Satisfy a General Contractor’s SIR

Posted in Articles by Jeffrey M. Paskert and Ryan E. Baya on Fri Jan 16, 2015

The recent Florida Supreme Court opinion Intervest Construction of Jax, Inc. v. General Fidelity Ins. Co., 133 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 2014) illustrates the effect contract interpretation principles can have on the evaluation and scope of insurance policies and coverages. Intervest concerned the application of a Self-Insured Retention Endorsement ("SIR"), and whether a general contractor or its insurer was obligated to fund a settlement for a bodily injury claim.

No Success in Successive Suits

Posted in Articles by Adam C. King on Fri Jan 16, 2015

More than 200 years after the original Tea Party, the English common law principle of res judicata and the related rule against splitting causes of action can produce unanticipated results in Florida lawsuits.

A Complicated Relationship – Is It Necessary To Plead A Special Relationship To State A Cause of Action for Common Law Indemnity?

Posted in Articles by Adam C. King on Fri Jan 16, 2015

In construction defect lawsuits, parties routinely assert common law indemnity claims against downstream subcontractors, material suppliers, and other entities whose work or materials caused the respective defects. Common law indemnity is a claim that shifts responsibility for damages from a party without any active negligence or fault, but who is liable for damages pursuant to vicarious, constructive, derivative, or technical liability principles, to the party who is actively negligent or at fault.

Innovative Advocacy for Our Clients.

What We Know

Now, a Subcontractor’s Indemnification Payment can be Used to Satisfy a General Contractor’s SIR

No Success in Successive Suits

A Complicated Relationship – Is It Necessary To Plead A Special Relationship To State A Cause of Action for Common Law Indemnity?

categories

archives